000			03501cam a2200457 i 4500
001			21346744
003			OSt
005			20250612115119.0
008			191227s2020 enk b 001 0 eng c
010			_a 2019957839
015			_aGBC078120 _2bnb
016	7		_a019824646 _2Uk
020			_a0198863373
020			_a9780198863373
035			_a(OCoLC)on1141117443
040			_aYDX _beng _cYDX _erda _dBDX _dOCLCQ _dERASA _dOCLCF _dUKMGB _dOCLCO _dGZL _dGUL _dOCL _dRCJ _dDLC
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aKZ1266 _b.R35 2020
100	1		_aRaible, Lea, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aHuman rights unbound : _ba theory of extraterritoriality / _cLea Raible.
250			_aFirst edition.
264		1	_aOxford, United Kingdom ; _aNew York, NY : _bOxford University Press, _c2020.
300			_axvi, 235 pages ; _c24 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 217-227) and index.
505	0	0	_tExtraterritoriality as a matter of interpretation -- _tThe values of international human rights law -- _tJurisdiction and justification -- _tA concept of power as the basis of jurisdiction -- _tJurisdiction as political power -- _tTitle to territory and jurisdiction : three and a half models -- _tConnecting the dots : case studies.
520	8		_aThis book explores to what extent a state owes human rights obligations to individuals outside of its territory, when the conduct of that state impacts upon the lives of those individuals. It draws upon legal and political philosophy to develop a theory of extraterritoriality based on the nature of human rights, merging accounts of economic, social, and cultural rights with those of civil and political rights Lea Raible outlines four main arguments aimed at changing the way we think about the extraterritoriality of human rights. First, she argues that questions regarding extraterritoriality are really about justifying the allocation of human rights obligations to specific states. Second, the book shows that human rights as found in international human rights treaties are underpinned by the values of integrity and equality. Third, she shows that these same values justify the allocation of human rights obligations towards specific individuals to public institutions - including states - that hold political power over those individuals. And finally, the book demonstrates that title to territory is best captured by the value of stability, as opposed to integrity and equality. On this basis, Raible concludes that all standards in international human rights treaties that count as human rights require that a threshold of jurisdiction, understood as political power over individuals, is met. The book applies this theory of extraterritoriality to explain the obligations of states in a wide range of cases.
650		0	_aInternational law and human rights.
650		0	_aHuman rights.
650		0	_aPolitical rights.
650		0	_aExterritoriality.
650		7	_aPolitical rights. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01069715
650		7	_aInternational law and human rights. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01894145
650		7	_aExterritoriality. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00918952
650		7	_aHuman rights. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00963285
906			_a7 _bcbc _cpccadap _d2 _eepcn _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBK MNGCL
999			_c44069 _d44069